Galois Correspondences I
In this post, we discuss the fundamental theorem of Galois theory along the consideration of Galois connections.
Galois Connections
Definition: An (antitone) Galois connection is a dual adjunction between posets. In other words, a Galois connection consists of the following data:
- Two posets ,
- Two order-reversing maps and ,
such that - and for all , .
One can see that and automatically satisfy the triangle identities: $$f\circ g\circ f = f, \qquad g\circ f\circ g = g,$$ and thus form a dual adjunction between posets.
Definition: An (antitone) Galois correspondence is a dual adjoint equivalence between posets, that is a Galois connection such that and .
One can verify the following basic fact.
Proposision: Any Galois connection induces a Galois correspondence .
Recall that a dual adjoint functor maps colimits to limits and gives canonical morphisms from colimits to the image of limits. Thus we have
Proposision: Let be a Galois connection. Then for any , we have
\begin{align*} f(\sup \{a_i\}) = \inf\{f(a_i)\}, &\quad& f(\inf\{a_i\}) \ge \sup\{f(a_i)\},\\ g(\sup\{b_j\}) = \inf\{g(b_j)\}, &\quad& g(\inf\{b_j\}) \ge \sup\{g(b_j)\}. \end{align*}
Remark: One can also consider the notions of monotone Galois connections and monotone Galois correspondences.
Galois Groups and Galois Extensions
Now we apply the above to algebraic field extensions. So throughout this section, every field extension is assumed to be algebraic.
First Galois Correspondence
First, we have the folloing Galois connection:
\begin{align*} \{\text{subgroups of }\mathrm{Aut}(K)\} & \longleftrightarrow \{\text{subfields of }K\}.\\ G & \longrightarrow K^G \\ \mathrm{Gal}(K/F) & \longleftarrow F. \end{align*}
Here we use to denote the group of automorphisms of fixing .
We define
Definition: A subgroup of is called a Galois group if , where is a subfield of . A field extension is called a Galois extension if , where is a subgroup of .
Then we obtain the Galois corresponding between Galois groups and Galois extensions. However, this correpondence is not the one the fundamental theorem of Galois theory states. To get it, we need to look closer. For the field extension side, we need to show that if is a Galois extension, then so are all where is an intermediate field of . This follows immediately once one proves the following lemma.
Lemma: A field extension is a Galois extension if and only if it is the splitting field of a family of separable polynomials.
Note that, from this, one can see any Galois extension must be a separable extension.
For the subgroup side, one only need to notice that the Galois subgroups must be closed. Then, we get the Galois correspondence for a Galois extension :
\begin{align*} \{\text{closed subgroups of }\mathrm{Gal}(K/F)\} & \longleftrightarrow \{\text{intermediate fields of }K/F\}.\\ H & \longrightarrow K^H\\ \mathrm{Gal}(K/E) & \longleftarrow E. \end{align*}
Note that under this corresponding, open subgroups of correspond finite subextensions of .
Second Galois Correspondence
Now, we restrict the map to the subposet of normal subgroups of and identify it with the opposite of the poset of quotient of . Then, we have the following order-reversing map
\begin{align*} \{\text{quotients of }\mathrm{Gal}(K/F)\} & \longleftrightarrow \{\text{intermediate fields of }K/F\}.\\ \mathrm{Gal}(K/F)/H & \longmapsto K^H. \end{align*}
One can see
In other word, is a quotient of with kernel .
For an arbitrary field extension , there is no need to be an epimorphism
Here denotes the absolutely Galois group .
Note that, , where is the separable closure of and is always Galois.
We define
Definition: A field extension is call a normal extension if any embedding induces an automorphism of over .
One can see that Galois = normal + separable if one has known the following lemma.
Lemma: A field extension is a normal extension if and only if it is the splitting field of a family of polynomials.
Now, one can now see that if is a normal extension, then there is a group homomorphism
\begin{align*} \mathrm{Gal}(F) & \longrightarrow \mathrm{Gal}(E/F). \\\ \sigma & \longmapsto \sigma|_E, \end{align*}
As any automorphism of a normal extension can be extended into an automorphism of , the above homomorphism is surjective. The kernel of it is obviously the absolutely Galois group .
In this way, we get a Galois connection:
\begin{align*} \{\text{quotients of }\mathrm{Gal}(F)\} & \longleftrightarrow \{\text{normal extensions of }F\}.\\ \mathrm{Gal}(F)/H & \longrightarrow F_{\mathrm{alg}}^H\\ \mathrm{Gal}(E) & \longleftarrow E. \end{align*}
Let be another normal extension such that . Then, by the Galois connection, we have
Therefore there is a homomorphism
\mathrm{Gal}(K/F)\longrightarrow\mathrm{Gal}(E/F). $$ fitting into the following commutative diagram
\begin{gather*}
\mathrm{Gal}(F_{\mathrm{alg}}/F) \
\swarrow\qquad\qquad\searrow \
\mathrm{Gal}(K/F)\longrightarrow\mathrm{Gal}(E/F)
\end{gather*}
and hence an epimorphism. In particular this holds for Galois extensions $K/F$. In this way, we get a Galois correspondence:
\begin{align*}
{\text{quotients of }\mathrm{Gal}(K/F)} & \longleftrightarrow
{\text{normal subextensions of }K/F}.\
\mathrm{Gal}(K/F)/H &
\longrightarrow K^H \
\mathrm{Gal}(K/E) &
\longleftarrow E.
\end{align*}
### The Degree Encoding Let $K/F$ be a field extension. The poset of closed subgroups of $G=\mathrm{Gal}(K/F)$ admits an order-preserving map $H\mapsto|H|$ and an order-reversing map $H\mapsto[G:H]$ to the poset of *supernatural numbers*. Moreover, we have
|G| = |H|\cdot[G:H].
Likewise, the poset of intermediate fields $E$ of $K/F$ admits an order-reversing map $E\mapsto[K:E]$ and an order-preserving map $E\mapsto[E:F]$ to the poset of supernatural numbers and we have
[K:F] = [K:E]\cdot[E:F].
The Galois correspondences suggest us to compare them. This is what Artin's theorem says. **Artin's Theorem:** Let $K$ be a field and $G$ a closed subgroup of $\mathrm{Aut}(K)$. Then
|G| = [K:K^G].
Note that when apply to Galois extensions $K/F$, the theorem implies
|H| = [K:K^H],
\quad\text{and}\quad
[G:H] = [K^H:F].
This post is long enough, so we may stop here. ## Reference For the missing notions and proofs in algebra, see any textbook such as - Serge Lang, *Algebra*, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, 1993. As for the infinite case of Galois theory, especially the notion of profinite groups and supernatural numbers, see - Michael D. Fried, Moshe Jarden, *Field Arithmetic*, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 3, Folge 11 (3rd ed.), Springer-Verlag, 2008.